Critical Judgment Projects: The International Criminal Court
This project focuses on a significant gap in International Criminal Court (ICC) research: the contribution of judges to the ICC’s poor conviction record for sexual and gender-based (SGB) crimes and their application of gender-sensitive judging in general. The research aims to provide new knowledge for judges, legal experts, and scholars to improve accountability for SGB crimes and to support a gender-sensitive approach to adjudication.
Articles/books chapters
Rosemary Grey, Kcasey McLooughlin and Louise Chappell, ‘Gender and Judging at the International Criminal Court: Lessons from ‘feminist judgment projects’ (2021) 34(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 247
Julie Stubbs, 'A Well-founded Fear? Giving Context to Self-Defence in Taikato v R' in H Douglas, F Bartlett, T Luker & R Hunter (eds.) Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and re-writing law (2014, Hart) pp 243-249
Heather Roberts and Laura Sweeney, 'Why (Re)Write Judgments?: Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law' (2015) 37(3) Sydney Law Review 457
Rosemary Hunter, 'The Power of Feminist Judgments?' (2012) 20(2) Feminist Legal Studies 135
Douglas, Heather et al Introduction to the Australian Feminist Judgments Project (includes Rosemary Hunter's checklist for feminist judgment writing).
Brunger, Yassin M; Emma Irving; and Diana Sankey, ‘The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo’
Commentary/Other Resources: